Research

Our Publications

Peer-reviewed papers, books and book chapters advancing computational neurosurgery and brain imaging science.

Flagship

Our most impactful work

These publications represent the lab's core scientific contributions, from AI-driven tumour segmentation and spectroscopic fingerprinting to fluorescence-guided surgery and the Declaration of Sydney.

Highlights

Selected recent papers

Browse, filter, and read peer-reviewed articles, conference proceedings, and book chapters and more.

Books

Books and book chapters

Comprehensive monographs and invited chapters authored by lab members, covering computational approaches to neurosurgical disease.

Book

Computational Neurosurgery

Di Ieva, A., Suero Molina, E., Liu, S., & Russo, C. (Eds.) (2024). Computational neurosurgery. (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Vol. 1462). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64892-2

Book

Computational Neuroscience

Di Ieva, A., Davidson, J. (Eds)(2026). Computational neuroscience. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/9781071654392

Book

The Fractal Geometry of the Brain

Di Ieva, A., (2024). The Fractal Geometry of the Brain. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-47606-8

Book

The Fractal Geometry of the Brain

Di Ieva A. (2016). The Fractal Geometry of the Brain. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4939-3995-4?page=2

Book

Computational Neurosurgery - Chinese Translation

Di Ieva, A., Suero Molina, E., Liu, S., & Russo, C. (Eds.) (2026). Computational neurosurgery. Springer.

Chapter

The fractal geometry of the brain: an overview

Di Ieva A.. The fractal geometry of the brain: an overview. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:3--13.

Chapter

Neurosurgery, explainable AI, and legal liability

Matulionyte R., Suero Molina E., Di Ieva A.. Neurosurgery, explainable AI, and legal liability. Computational neurosurgery. 2024;:543--553.

Chapter

Meta-transfer learning for brain tumor segmentation: within and beyond glioma

Yan S., Liu S., Di Ieva A., Pagnucco M., Song Y.. Meta-transfer learning for brain tumor segmentation: within and beyond glioma. Computational neurosurgery. 2024;:221--230.

Chapter

Machine and deep learning in hyperspectral fluorescence-guided brain tumor surgery

Suero Molina E., Black D., Xie A., Gill J., Di Ieva A., Stummer W.. Machine and deep learning in hyperspectral fluorescence-guided brain tumor surgery. Computational neurosurgery. 2024;:245--264.

Chapter

Large language models in neurosurgery

Di Ieva A., Stewart C., Suero Molina E.. Large language models in neurosurgery. Computational neurosurgery. 2024;:177--198.

Chapter

Fractals, pattern recognition, memetics, and AI: a personal journal in the computational neurosurgery

Di Ieva A.. Fractals, pattern recognition, memetics, and AI: a personal journal in the computational neurosurgery. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:273--283.

Chapter

Fractals in the neurosciences: a translational geographical approach

Andronache I., Peptenatu D., Ahammer H., Radulovic M., Djuričić G.J., Jelinek H.F., Russo C., Di Ieva A.. Fractals in the neurosciences: a translational geographical approach. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:953--981.

Chapter

Fractals in neuroimaging

Lahmiri S., Boukadoum M., Di Ieva A.. Fractals in neuroimaging. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:429--444.

Chapter

Fractals in neuroanatomy and basic neurosciences: an overview

Di Ieva A.. Fractals in neuroanatomy and basic neurosciences: an overview. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:141--147.

Chapter

Fractal-based analysis of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs)

Di Ieva A., Reishofer G.. Fractal-based analysis of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:413--428.

Chapter

Fractal-based analysis of histological features of brain tumors

Al-Kadi O.S., Di Ieva A.. Fractal-based analysis of histological features of brain tumors. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:501--524.

Chapter

Fractal time series: background, estimation methods, and performances

Porcaro C., Moaveninejad S., D’Onofrio V., DiIeva A.. Fractal time series: background, estimation methods, and performances. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:95--137.

Chapter

Fractal geometry meets computational intelligence: future perspectives

Livi L., Sadeghian A., Di Ieva A.. Fractal geometry meets computational intelligence: future perspectives. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:983--997.

Chapter

Fractal dimension studies of the brain shape in aging and neurodegenerative diseases

Davidson J.M., Zhang L., Yue G.H., Di Ieva A.. Fractal dimension studies of the brain shape in aging and neurodegenerative diseases. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:329--363.

Chapter

Fractal dimension analysis in neurological disorders: an overview

Díaz Beltrán L., Madan C.R., Finke C., Krohn S., Di Ieva A., Esteban F.J.. Fractal dimension analysis in neurological disorders: an overview. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:313--328.

Chapter

Fractal analysis in clinical neurosciences: an overview

Di Ieva A.. Fractal analysis in clinical neurosciences: an overview. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:261--271.

Chapter

Declaration of computational neurosurgery

Di Ieva A., Suero Molina E., Somerville M.A., Beheshti A., Staartjes V.E., Serra C., Theodore N., Elliott J.M., Wesselink E.O., Russo C., Pilitsis J.G., Bennett C.C., Wu S., Hammond F.M., Lozano A.M., Cusimano M.D., Davidson J.M., Castellano J.F., Okonkwo D.O., Arefan D., Lee C., Zanier O., Da Mutten R., Matula C., Rutka J.T., Pease M., Liu S., Stummer W., Matulionyte R., Yang H., Yuwen C., Cheng X., Fan H., Wang X., Ge Z., Cepeda S., Sheehan J.P., Yang J.Y.M., Hamer R.P., Cohen-Gadol A., Hansford J.R., Savage G., Sowman P.F., Stewart C., Kateb B., Sherif C., Perperidis A., Guller A., Hanft S., D’Amico R.S., Sav A., Cong C., Song Y., Nicolosi F., Wiedmann M.K.H., Barone D.G., Noorani I., Magnussen J., Krieg S.M., Meling T.R., De Ridder D., Lawton M.T., Rosenfeld J.V.. Declaration of computational neurosurgery. Computational neurosurgery. 2024;:11--20.

Chapter

Cross-Modality Synthesis of T1c MRI from Non-contrast Images Using GANs: Implications for Brain Tumor Research

Tabassum M., Rana P., Suero Molina E., Di Ieva A., Liu S.. Cross-Modality Synthesis of T1c MRI from Non-contrast Images Using GANs: Implications for Brain Tumor Research. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 2024;:60–69.

Chapter

Computational neurosurgery: Foundation

Di Ieva A., Suero Molina E., Liu S., Russo C.. Computational neurosurgery: Foundation. Computational neurosurgery. 2024;:1--8.

Chapter

Computational fractal-based neurosurgery

Di Ieva A., Davidson J.M., Russo C.. Computational fractal-based neurosurgery. Computational neurosurgery. 2024;:97--105.

Chapter

Computational fractal-based analysis of MR susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in neuro-oncology and neurotraumatology

Di Ieva A.. Computational fractal-based analysis of MR susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in neuro-oncology and neurotraumatology. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:445--468.

Chapter

Computational and translational fractal-based analysis in the translational neurosciences: an overview

Di Ieva A.. Computational and translational fractal-based analysis in the translational neurosciences: an overview. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:781--793.

Chapter

Computational fractal-based analysis of brain tumor microvascular networks

Di Ieva A., Al-Kadi O.S.. Computational fractal-based analysis of brain tumor microvascular networks. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:525--544.

Chapter

Artificial intelligence, radiomics, and computational modeling in skull base surgery

Suero Molina E., Di Ieva A.. Artificial intelligence, radiomics, and computational modeling in skull base surgery. Computational neurosurgery. 2024;:265--283.

Chapter

Artificial intelligence in brain tumors

Suero Molina E., Azemi G., Russo C., Liu S., Di Ieva A.. Artificial intelligence in brain tumors. Computational neurosurgery. 2024;:201--220.

Chapter

Artificial intelligence methods

Liu S., Russo C., Suero Molina E., Di Ieva A.. Artificial intelligence methods. Computational neurosurgery. 2024;:21--38.

Chapter

Analyzing eye paths using fractals

Newport R.A., Liu S., Di Ieva A.. Analyzing eye paths using fractals. The fractal geometry of the brain. 2024;:827--848.

Chapter

An experimental verification of neurophysics treatment by executing a multifractal analysis of surface electromyography signals on trapezius, abdominals, and adductor muscles in athletes

Rinzivillo C., Kaleagasioglu F., Casciaro F., Scoppa F., Marvulli R., Ware K., Conte E., Di Ieva A.. An experimental verification of neurophysics treatment by executing a multifractal analysis of surface electromyography signals on trapezius, abdominals, and adductor muscles in athletes. Complexity science in human change. 2024;:81--117.

Chapter

Robotics for approaches to the anterior cranial fossa

Anokwute M.C., Christodoulides A., Campbell R.G., Harvey R.J., Ieva A.D.. Robotics for approaches to the anterior cranial fossa. Robotics in skull-base surgery. 2023;:35--52.

Publications

0
publications
Types
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Topics
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Years
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Preprint
2020

Advanced computational and statistical multiparametric analysis of Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging to characterize gliomas and brain metastases

Ieva A.D., Russo C., Le Reste P.J., Magnussen J.S., Heller G.
openRxiv

Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is a technique useful for evaluation of the internal structures of brain tumors, including microvasculature and microbleeds. Intratumoral patterns of magnetic susceptibility can be quantified by means of fractal analysis. Here, we propose a radiomics methodological pipeline to merge advanced fractal-based computational modelling with statistical analysis to objectively characterize the fingerprint of gliomas and brain metastases. Forty-seven patients with glioma (grades II-IV, according to the WHO 2016 classification system) and fourteen with brain metastases underwent 3 Tesla MRI using a SWI protocol. All images underwent computational analysis aimed to quantify three Euclidean parameters (related to tumor and SWI volume) and five fractal-based parameters (related to the pixel distribution and geometrical complexity of the SWI patterns). Principal components analysis, linear and quadratic discriminant analysis, K-nearest neighbor and support vector machine methods were used to discriminate between tumor types. The combination of parameters offered an objective evaluation of the SWI pattern in gliomas and brain metastases. The model accurately predicted 88% of glioblastoma, according to the quantification of intratumoral SWI features, failing to discriminate the other types. SWI is not normally used to classify brain tumors, however fractal-based multi-parametric computational analysis can be used to characterize intratumoral SWI patterns to objectively quantify tumors-related features. Specific parameters still have to be identified to provide completely automatic computerized differential diagnosis.

Read more
Computational Neuroimaging
Journal article
2020

A Deep Learning Methodology for Differentiating Glioma Recurrence from Radiation Necrosis using Multimodal MRI: Algorithm Development and Validation (Preprint)

Gao Y., Xiao X., Han B., Li G., Ning X., Wang D., Cai W., Kikinis R., Berkovsky S., Ieva A.D., Zhang L., Ji N., Liu S.
JMIR Medical Informatics

Background: The radiological differential diagnosis between tumor recurrence and radiation-induced necrosis (ie, pseudoprogression) is of paramount importance in the management of glioma patients.

Objective: This research aims to develop a deep learning methodology for automated differentiation of tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis based on routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 146 patients who underwent radiation therapy after glioma resection and presented with suspected recurrent lesions at the follow-up MRI examination were selected for analysis. Routine MRI scans were acquired from each patient, including T1, T2, and gadolinium-contrast-enhanced T1 sequences. Of those cases, 96 (65.8%) were confirmed as glioma recurrence on postsurgical pathological examination, while 50 (34.2%) were diagnosed as necrosis. A light-weighted deep neural network (DNN)(ie, efficient radionecrosis neural network [ERN-Net]) was proposed to learn radiological features of gliomas and necrosis from MRI scans. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate performance of the model in both image-wise and subject-wise classifications. Preoperative diagnostic performance of the model was also compared to that of the state-of-the-art DNN models and five experienced neurosurgeons.

Results: DNN models based on multimodal MRI outperformed single-modal models. ERN-Net achieved the highest AUC in both image-wise (0.915) and subject-wise (0.958) classification tasks. The evaluated DNN models achieved an average sensitivity of 0.947 (SD 0.033), specificity of 0.817 (SD 0.075), and accuracy of 0.903 (SD 0.026), which were significantly better than the tested neurosurgeons (P=. 02 in sensitivity and P<. 001 in specificity and accuracy).

Conclusions: Deep learning offers a useful computational tool for the differential diagnosis between recurrent gliomas and necrosis. The proposed ERN-Net model, a simple and effective DNN model, achieved excellent performance on routine MRI scans and showed a high clinical applicability.

medinform.jmir.org

Read more
Computational Neuroimaging
Letter
2019

Letter to the Editor Regarding The Exoscope in Neurosurgery: An Innovative Point of View. A Systematic Review of the Technical, Surgical, and Educational Aspects

Ieva A.D., Tschabitscher M.
World Neurosurgery
Computational Neurosurgery
Journal article
2019

How I do it: 3D exoscopic endoscope-assisted microvascular decompression

Ng A.L.C., Ieva A.D.
Acta Neurochirurgica

Background

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is an effective treatment for drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm. However, failure of symptomatic improvement can arise from difficulties in identifying and/or decompressing the offending vessel. Microscopic and endoscopic techniques have been used to improve visualisation and safety of the procedure but there are limitations to each technique.

Method

A 3D exoscopic endoscope-assisted MVD technique is described, including advice on potential pitfalls.

Conclusion

Compared with the standard microscope-assisted techniques, the 3D exoscopic endoscope-assisted MVD offers an improved visualisation without compromising the field of view within and outside the surgical field.

Read more
Computational Neurosurgery
Journal article
2019

Computational quantitative MR image features - a potential useful tool in differentiating glioblastoma from solitary brain metastasis

Petrujkić K., Milosević N., Rajković N., Stanisavljević D., Gavrilović S., Dzelebdzić D., Ilić R., Ieva A.D., Maksimović R.
European Journal of Radiology

Purpose

Glioblastomas (GBM) and metastases are the most frequent malignant brain tumors in the adult population. Their presentation on conventional MRI is quite similar, but treatment strategy and prognosis are substantially different. Even with advanced MR techniques, in some cases diagnostic uncertainty remains. The main objective of this study was to determine whether fractal, texture, or both MR image analyses could aid in differentiating glioblastoma from solitary brain metastasis.

Method

In a retrospective study of 55 patients (30 glioblastomas and 25 solitary metastases) who underwent T2W/SWI/CET1 MRI, quantitative parameters of fractal and texture analysis were estimated, using box-counting and gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) methods.

Results

All five GLCM parameters obtained from T2W images showed significant difference between glioblastomas and solitary metastases, as well as on CET1 images except correlation (SCOR), contrary to SWI images which showed different values of two parameters (angular second moment-SASM and contrast-SCON). Only three fractal features (binary box dimension-Dbin, normalized box dimension-Dnorm and lacunarity-λ) measured on T2W and Dnorm measured on CET1 images significantly differed GBMs from solitary metastases. The highest sensitivity and specificity were obtained from inverse difference moment (SIDM) on T2W and SIDM on CET1 images, respectively. Combination of several GLCM parameters yielded better results. The processing of T2W images provided the most significantly different parameters between the groups, followed by CET1 and SWI images.

Conclusions

Computational-aided quantitative image analysis may potentially improve diagnostic accuracy. According to our results texture features are more significant than fractal-based features in differentiation glioblastoma from solitary metastasis.

Read more
Computational Neuroimaging
Journal article
2019

AI-augmented multidisciplinary teams: hype or hope?

Di Ieva A.
The Lancet

Over the past few years, the approach to treating diseases has switched from the solo expertise of a single specialist to treatment orchestrated by a multidisciplinary team, with the intention of merging the opinions of various experts in an optimum way to treat patients. Multidisciplinary teams are the backbone of the decision making that forms the basis of modern medicine. The multi disciplinary team offers a more hierarchical, highlevel, and complex system compared with a single specialist, and aims to determine the most plausible differential diagnosis, relate this to the most probable prognosis, and select the best course of treatment. An incorrect differential diagnosis might lead to error cascades, the consequences of which are inaccurate expectations and imprecise treatments. However, multidisciplinary teams can still be limited by insufficient expertise of the single members, outofdate knowledge on the relevant evidence based medical literature, consolidated teams that are not open to new opinions or participants, and logistical or communication barriers. In recent years, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has greatly increased, although the field is still challenged by particular concerns and the absence of validation against the opinions of experts or across different populations1 and by the absence of a standardised method of analysis. 2 AI methods can be used to help clinicians and surgeons with decision making, to reduce errors in judgment and improve differential diagnosis, and thereby improve the choice of treatment and patient outcome. The underlying fear of a dystopic challenge wherein AI is in competition with human experts can be overcome by viewing AI as a means to create a socalled augmented physician, with the exper tise of specialists enhanced by AI. This alternative view would shift the paradigm from one of humanversus machine, to humanandmachine. 3 Machines will not replace physicians, but physicians using AI will soon replace those not using it. Likewise, decisions from the multidisciplinary team meetings of the next generation are likely to be implemented by the machine, as AI will support more objective and reliable decision making, reducing the limitations of human error and subjectivity related to the single specialist or team. As stated by Enrico Coiera, 4 the way to prepare for these coming times is adapting clinical education to the digital world, to build the capacity for enhanced decision making and prognostication among physicians by means of AI. Continuous vigilance around advice validation will still be of paramount importance, 5 to avoid physicians blindly following the machinetracked pathway over the course of a patient’s diagnosis and therapy. In addressing the need to adapt in response to the fate of medicine in this time of AI, 4 the fate of multidisciplinary teams is to change as well.

Read more
Computational Neurosurgery
Conference paper
2018

Transcranial colour duplex and central aortic pressure measurements in the management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a pilot study using non-invasive measures

Busch K., Avolio A., Butlin M., Kiat H., Di Ieva A., Assaad N., Tan I.

Background: Following removal of an arteriovenous malformation of the brain (bAVM) the redistribution of blood can impose several clinically challenging issues including intracranial haemorrhage and arteriovenous capillary hypertensive syndrome. The underlying mechanism of such complications remains controversial, although control of blood pressure has been recognised as an integral component in haemorrhage prevention. Serial daily non-invasive monitoring for patients in this instance would be beneficial in improving management. Transcranial colour duplex (TCD) is a potential technique for providing pressure measurements and real-time, dynamic, haemodynamic spectra. Aim: To establish whether blood outflow velocity in the middle cerebral vein (MCV) can be quantified in the days following bAVM resection and whether values differ from other types of intracranial surgery. Methods: Blood pressure and TCD of 13 patients (aged 46±19 y, 7 female) having bAVMs resected and 7 patients having other intracranial surgeries (control group, aged 48±15 y, 6 female) were studied for days 1 to 3 following surgery. Ultrasound via the transtemporal window was used to obtain diameter, as well as peak and end-diastolic velocity of the MCV. Brachial blood pressure was also obtained using an automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor. Results: Systolic (bAVM 96±2 mmHg, control 89±10 mmHg; P=0.68) and diastolic blood pressure (bAVM 55±2 mmHg, control 48±7 mmHg; P=0.92) did not differ between the groups. MCV peak systolic velocity was greater in the bAVM group (34±20 cm/s, controls 20±9 cm/s; P=0.049). The control group had peak systolic velocities ranging from 9 to 32 cm/s. Peak systolic velocity in the bAVM group varied from 9 to 98 cm/s. End diastolic velocity (bAVM 13±11 cm/s, control 13±6 cm/s; P=0.89) and diameters (bAVM 37±19 mm, control 26±7 mm; P=0.16) did not differ between the groups. Two of the bAVM patients that had sustained high MCV peak velocities had a post-operative haemorrhage. Conclusions: Unusually elevated blood flow velocities and diameters were observed in the MCV of patients following bAVM resection. Findings on this small data set provide insight into plausible vessel remodelling and elucidate a post-operative time frame when vessels may have impaired autoregulation of cerebral blood flow.

Read more
Computational Neurosurgery
Book
2016

The Fractal Geometry of the Brain

Di Ieva A.
Springer

Reviews the most intriguing applications of fractal analysis in neuroscience with a focus on current and future potential, limits, advantages, and disadvantages. Will bring an understanding of fractals to clinicians and researchers also if they do not have a mathematical background, and will serve as a good tool for teaching the translational applications of computational models to students and scholars of different disciplines. This comprehensive collection is organized in four parts: (1) Basics of fractal analysis; (2) Applications of fractals to the basic neurosciences; (3) Applications of fractals to the clinical neurosciences; (4) Analysis software, modeling and methodology.

Read more
Neuromethods